Let me see if I have this straight. Adding a trillion dollar entitlement program to the national coifers will lower the national debt while repealing it will add to the national debt. Repealing health care will make Medicare costs increase even though part of the money to fund health care was supposed to come from Medicare waste. So how will it go into debt if there is all of this waste? How can not funding a government entitlement program that isn't in existence yet add to the debt? Why is this the only bill in the last 50 years for which we were going to be taxed for two years before it goes into effect?
Strange times indeed.
Showing posts with label health care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care. Show all posts
Monday, January 10, 2011
Friday, November 5, 2010
Random thoughts about the election and American scene.
Had a couple of drinks with my friend Jon at The Mint here in Belgrade. Our waitress/bartender has a husband who has served two tours in Iraq. Jon asked to borrow $60 bucks from me as he was out of cash. I didn't ask why. He's good for it. He says " I'm going to buy her and her husband dinner for his service." I told him I was in for half. She was very touched. Even better news. She said she'd been offered a position at The Grantree where I stop every Friday. Jessica, I look forward to seeing you there and thanks to your husband Nate for his service.
Things that crossed my mind while wondering how Barry and the media don't get it.
Things that crossed my mind while wondering how Barry and the media don't get it.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
The slippery slope of the stimulus
The liberals insisted on borrowing a trillion dollars to "stimulate" the economy. They used 1/2 the money they borrowed. Most of it kept government and union jobs safe. The other 1/2 has yet to be spent. Now our Chairman Mao Barry wants to borrow ANOTHER 50 billion for infrastructure repair. What's the matter with taking it out of the money you haven't spent? What happened to those "shovel ready jobs"? Honestly, have we ever had a less capable leader?
A trillion is a lot. It's 12 zeros. We have 300 million people in the US. According to the latest figures on Wiki, 73% of Americans make less than $70K annually. If we had given each person below $75K the stimulus money and told them they could spend it without paying it back, it would have stimulated the economy big time. That's $4,500.00 for every man, woman and child. A family of four would have received $18,000.00. We would have received a far better return on our money than saving the job of some teacher.
A trillion is a lot. It's 12 zeros. We have 300 million people in the US. According to the latest figures on Wiki, 73% of Americans make less than $70K annually. If we had given each person below $75K the stimulus money and told them they could spend it without paying it back, it would have stimulated the economy big time. That's $4,500.00 for every man, woman and child. A family of four would have received $18,000.00. We would have received a far better return on our money than saving the job of some teacher.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Obamacare saves money? Reeeeeeallly!
OK so this is from Senator Judd Gregg the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee and it explains the CBO report in detail Here's a shocker. Nancy Cakeface and the President are lying. Here is the link for the article that appears below. I couldn't copy the last page which shows the bottom line and that this thing in NO WAY reduces the deficit.
For Immediate Release March 18, 2010
Budget Perspective: The Real Deficit Effect of the Health Bill
Deficit increase of $582 billion over first ten years.
Deficit increase of $1.6 trillion over second ten years.
What do Democrats say about the Senate-passed health bill that the House is about to vote on? They say that, according to CBO, their bill reduces the deficit by $118 billion in the first ten years (and by $812 billion from 2020-2029, although CBO does not actually estimate that figure; instead, CBO provides only a ballpark estimate that the net change in the deficit would be from 0.25-0.50 percent of GDP over those 10 years).
CBO says a lot of other important things in its 28-page cost estimate. Boiling down the budgetary effect of this massive bill into just one number, as the Democrats do, is a misleading exercise.
For Immediate Release March 18, 2010
Budget Perspective: The Real Deficit Effect of the Health Bill
Deficit increase of $582 billion over first ten years.
Deficit increase of $1.6 trillion over second ten years.
What do Democrats say about the Senate-passed health bill that the House is about to vote on? They say that, according to CBO, their bill reduces the deficit by $118 billion in the first ten years (and by $812 billion from 2020-2029, although CBO does not actually estimate that figure; instead, CBO provides only a ballpark estimate that the net change in the deficit would be from 0.25-0.50 percent of GDP over those 10 years).
CBO says a lot of other important things in its 28-page cost estimate. Boiling down the budgetary effect of this massive bill into just one number, as the Democrats do, is a misleading exercise.
Labels:
Barry,
health care,
liberal=wussy=redundant,
politics
Friday, March 12, 2010
What's in it for Harry Reid?
Here's a question as Congress gets ready to pass this abomination of legislation disguised as health care "reform". What's in it for Harry Reid? A man of less principle is hard to find in DC. One would have to go all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to find a man of less moral conviction. Harry Reid is a career politician and the Senate Majority leader. He is also trailing every republican candidate in Nevada for re-election. Not one. EVERY one. All four. Is it just me or does this strike anyone else as odd? I mean, this guy is going to give not only his Senate seat, but his position as the leader of the Senate. All for health care "reform". Are we to believe that this man has that much conviction on the issue of health care "reform".
I'm sorry but I'm not buying it. Let's check back here this time next year and see what Harry is doing. I guaranfuckingtee it will be making lots and lots of money for something tied to health care "reform". Guys like Harry don't leave jobs like that of a U.S. Senator, especially as Majority Leader, if they aren't going to make lots of money. Hell, Tom Daschle even had dead Indians voting twice for him he was so desperate to keep his seat. This entire bill is prime for corruption and the erosion of our system as we know it and Harry will be making lots of money.
I wonder how many sob stories there will be after the government takes over our health care industry as compared to the absolute bullshit these spineless pukes, better know as Democrats, have been pulling out lately. Get ready America. We are about to become a firs-rate, second-rate nation.
I'm sorry but I'm not buying it. Let's check back here this time next year and see what Harry is doing. I guaranfuckingtee it will be making lots and lots of money for something tied to health care "reform". Guys like Harry don't leave jobs like that of a U.S. Senator, especially as Majority Leader, if they aren't going to make lots of money. Hell, Tom Daschle even had dead Indians voting twice for him he was so desperate to keep his seat. This entire bill is prime for corruption and the erosion of our system as we know it and Harry will be making lots of money.
I wonder how many sob stories there will be after the government takes over our health care industry as compared to the absolute bullshit these spineless pukes, better know as Democrats, have been pulling out lately. Get ready America. We are about to become a firs-rate, second-rate nation.
Labels:
Bobcats,
health care,
liberal=wussy=redundant,
politics
Thursday, March 11, 2010
And yet, more health care.
Moi over at Bite the Apple has written an excellent piece on the health care debate. I've linked it here. It's awesome.
It's well worth the read but if you're pressed for time here's the last paragraph:
Anyway. I don't see how you can crack the barn door and not expect the horses to do nothing more than stick the points of their noses through. We either decide we are a country individuals free to make our own way, free to take responsibility for our lives and those of our families and loved ones, free to ask for help and free to give it, OR we decide we are a country of victims who in lieu of striving and creating, demand to have everything handed to us and enslave ourselves and our neighbors in order to do so.
I don’t see any in between. If you do, tell me. I’d love to know what it is.
Well done Moi. Well done.
It's well worth the read but if you're pressed for time here's the last paragraph:
Anyway. I don't see how you can crack the barn door and not expect the horses to do nothing more than stick the points of their noses through. We either decide we are a country individuals free to make our own way, free to take responsibility for our lives and those of our families and loved ones, free to ask for help and free to give it, OR we decide we are a country of victims who in lieu of striving and creating, demand to have everything handed to us and enslave ourselves and our neighbors in order to do so.
I don’t see any in between. If you do, tell me. I’d love to know what it is.
Well done Moi. Well done.
Labels:
health care,
liberal=wussy=redundant,
politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)